As I coach professionals, I am noticing a compelling pattern: what manifests as a "challenge"* in one environment often emerges as a strength in another. When reflecting on your perceived professional limitations, consider whether these traits truly require correction — or whether they might flourish in a different context.
I'm not addressing genuinely problematic behaviors like dismissing new ideas without consideration or poor emotional regulation. Rather, I'm focusing on those self-observed tendencies that seem to impede success in your current role. For instance, being a committed team player or eschewing the spotlight might hinder advancement in environments that reward individual achievement — academia being a prime example. (Yes, "team science" exists, but tenure and promotion criteria still predominantly recognize individual accomplishments.)
Consider decisiveness: while thoughtful leaders certainly weigh multiple perspectives, being labeled "too decisive" may simply reflect an organizational culture that prizes lengthy deliberation. A decisive leader might thrive in environments that embrace innovation and tolerate failure.
I'm not necessarily advocating job change (though that might ultimately be appropriate). Instead, I'm suggesting a critical examination of your self-perceived challenges: Are these genuine shortcomings, or misalignments between your natural strengths and your current environment? What appears as a limitation in one context may actually be your superpower in another.
I welcome your thoughts on this perspective.
*"Weaknesses" has become outdated terminology that warrants replacement in our professional discussion in leadership.